Barriers to a National EHR Implementation

For our 3rd coursework, we are tasked to read a research article entitled “Barriers to the acceptance of electronic medical records by physicians from systematic review to taxonomy and interventions”, then do a write-up on the following scenario:

You have been selected to be the project manager for a DOH project with the task of implementing a national EHR that all government hospitals will implement.  Select at least three barriers to EHR implementation from the article that you believe to be the most important ones that might adversely affect your implementation. Explain and provide supporting cases/articles/information.

Barrier

The objective of the research study as stated in the authors’ abstract was to identify, categorize, and analyze barriers perceived by physicians to the adoption of Electronic Medical Records (EMRs) in order to provide implementers with beneficial intervention options. They based their systematic literature review from different research papers from 1998 to 2009. The study resulted to eight main categories of barriers including 31 sub-categories which are the following:

A: Financial

  1. Start-up costs
  2. High ongoing cost
  3. Uncertainty over Return on Investment (ROI)
  4. Lack of financial resources

B: Technical

  1. Physicians and/or staff lack computer skills
  2. Lack of technical training and support
  3. Complexity of the system
  4. Limitations of the system
  5. Lack of customizability
  6. Lack of Reliability
  7. Interconnectivity/Standardization
  8. Lack of computers/hardware

C: Time

  1. Time required to select, purchase, and implement the system
  2. Time to learn the system
  3. Time required to enter data
  4. More time per patient
  5. Time to convert patient records

D: Psychological

  1. Lack of belief in EMRs
  2. Need for control

E: Social

  1. Uncertainty about the vendor
  2. Lack of support from external parties
  3. Interference with doctor-patient relationship
  4. Lack of support from other colleagues
  5. Lack of support from the management level

F: Legal

  1. Privacy or security concerns

G: Organizational

  1. Organizational size
  2. Organizational type

H: Change Process

  1. Lack of support from the organizational culture
  2. Lack of incentives
  3. Lack of participation
  4. Lack of leadership

If I were to be the project manager who will implement a national Electronic Health Record (EHR) that government hospitals will use, part of my job is to plan on how to successfully implement this project and sorts of barriers can inhibit successful planning. To be able to achieve the desired results, I must identify all possible barriers and exert efforts to deal with them.

Though all of the identified barriers mentioned above are important, I believe that these three to be discussed below have the most impact in the EHR implementation.

1. FINANCIAL

According to a survey, the cost of installing and maintaining EHR systems is the biggest barrier to the adoption by medical group practices, particularly for the smallest physician groups. Since this is a national project implementation, as the project manager, it is essential to know the budget and all the costs included such as purchase price, coordination costs, monitoring costs, and negotiating costs, upgrade costs, and governance costs, to get the EHR implemented across all the government hospitals. A lack of financial fund can consequentially cause problems to sustain the deployment.

2. ORGANIZATIONAL

The organizational category of barrier includes the characteristics of individual practices which are a factor in EHR implementation such as the size and the type of the organization. As a project manager, I have to assess the size of the hospital because this characteristic affects the extent of support and training systems. For instance, a large organization requires more time to choose, purchase, learn a system, and gather data.

Also, this category barrier may adversely affect the implementation of EHR due to its influence to the other categories because it determines the relative significance of the other barriers even before implementation has started. For example, a small practice is foreseen to face greater challenges in dealing with financial issues, which is one of the barriers in EHR implementation, than a large practice. The lack of knowledge in this category barrier can result to other major barriers.

3. CHANGE PROCESS

EHR implementation entails acceptance from physicians to new practices, however, some physicians resist. As a project manager, the “Change Process” category must also be identified as one of the most important to be addressed as this can bring about other barriers to a successful EHR adoption process. The government hospitals should show support by building an EHR-friendly culture as part of the change process. This can be achieved by letting experienced doctors be part of the application team leaders in the project who will participate in the whole process. This will not only help the physicians accept the change enthusiastically but their involvement will also make the system tailored to the doctors’ preferred workflows. Another way to do the change process is to make certain that the management of the government hospitals are motivating the physicians by presenting the benefits they can get from the usage of EHR. The more they see the advantages, the more motivated they will be, and the more willing they will become in accepting the new process.

Electronic health records can improve the health care delivery but the process of the implementation is challenging not only on the execution but starting from the planning stage which includes identifying the barriers to the implementation. Nevertheless, these barriers can be overcome. Like what Joshua J. Marine said:

“Challenges are what make life interesting and

overcoming them is what makes life meaningful.”

References:
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20691097
https://www.ehrinpractice.com/ehr-implementation-stats.html
https://www.cliffsnotes.com/study-guides/principles-of-management/organizational-planning/identifying-barriers-to-planning
https://blog.vinfotech.com/healthcare/emr/barriers-to-the-acceptance-of-emr-by-physicians
https://www.commonwealthfund.org/publications/newsletter-article/cost-biggest-barrier-electronic-medical-records-implementation

Efficacy and Satisfaction of Electronic Handover System for Surgical Patients

Our first coursework for MI 227 Class required us to search and choose an article describing an adoption of a clinical or laboratory information system or application.

The summary of the article will focus on the following:

  • What are the key points of the article?
  • What lessons learned does it describe?
  • How can this relate to the local setting in the Philippines?

The literature that I will discuss is an investigation of the efficacy and satisfaction of an electronic system for clinical transfers of patients, also known as handover, with complex surgical procedures.

Handover

What is a handover?

A handover involves the transfer of professional responsibility and accountability for some or all aspects of care for a patient, or groups of patients, to another person, such as a clinician or nurse, or professional group on a temporary or permanent basis.

Key Points

Significance

The handover of patients is vital to patient safety and this is complex for patients after surgery because it involves communications among healthcare teams. Surgical patients may be more vulnerable to handover errors than patients in other clinical specialties due to the extensive amount of information needed to be transferred, such as record of operations, anesthesia records, administered medications, laboratories and diagnostics, and blood transfusions.

Purpose

With the widespread use of electronic health records (EHRs), an integrated handover system would be favorable to the healthcare team for continuity in surgical patient care. An electronic handover system will provide a standardized and accurate data hand-offs. Therefore, the authors established an electronic handover system (EHS) in their hospital to assist care transfer between the ER, OR, PACU, ICU, and general ward. The EHS aims to to provide a safer environment for patient handover. The efficacy of the EHS was assessed based on the time elapsed during surgical handover. Levels of user satisfaction with the handover were compared before and after the EHS.

Method

Four surgery-related units in MacKay Memorial Hospital, a 1100-bed teaching hospital in Taipei, were enrolled in the 3-month study period: the OR, PACU, a general surgical ward, and a surgical ICU. The EHS was connected with the EHR directly without Health Level-7 interface. The central database of the EHR recorded patient profiles, laboratory and image results, and prescribed medications. To share information between the different surgical units, the introduction, situation, background, assessment, and recommendation (ISBAR) model formed the core layout of the EHS.

A questionnaire was used to assess satisfaction with the handover process and the perception of patient safety before and after the EHS implementation. The questionnaire used a 5-item Likert scale with balanced rating items. There were four related questions about satisfaction with the current handover process, four questions about the completeness of communication, and 12 questions about teamwork during the handover process.

Results

Twenty (20) randomly selected nursing handovers were observed before and after the EHS. The nurses spent 5.1 minutes less on beside handovers (from 10.5 to 5.4 minutes), as shown in Table 1.

Table 1

 

Table 1

The participants with different professional specialties showed similar trends toward increased satisfaction after the EHS. The overall satisfaction rate with the handover process increased from 69.4% to 79.3%, as shown in Table 2.

Table 2

Table 2

Providers said they were satisfied with the process and thought it improved efficiency, accuracy, and safety. Among participants who were not satisfied with the traditional handover process, the satisfaction rate increased significantly after implementation of the EHS. The questionnaires also showed that inexperienced nurses relied more on the EHS because of its accurate information and standardization of the handover process.

Lessons Learned

The study showed that the EHS reduced 48.6% of the time spent on handovers for surgical patients who were transferred from the ER, the OR, PACU, and to the surgical ward. Since the EHS can retrieve patients’ information from the EHR, the clinicians now spent minimal time in collecting data resulting to reduced duration of surgical handover. Although there may be some different information needs for the healthcare team, the authors found the structured handover based on the ISBAR model could satisfy more than 80% of clinician needs in different fields.

How Can This Relate to the Philippine Setting?

Some hospitals here in the Philippines are implementing some clinical information systems, however, I have not encountered, even in the largest hospitals, an electronic handover. I believe that this type of clinical information system, if done effectively, would greatly prevent patient harm and would contribute to a sustainable improvement in effective patient care and safety.

References:
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30074514
https://www.bmj.com/content/359/bmj.j4328.full

Application Idea for Diabetes

This week is probably the hardest among all the weekly outputs that are required from us in our Health Informatics class.

How can mobile applications be used for diabetes?
Propose an app idea for diabetes. Your app idea must not duplicate any app already available in the market.
When you search “diabetes” or “diabetes management” in Apple Store and Google Play, you will get more than a hundred results. Some of the applications can do the following:
  • Monitor blood sugar levels, carbohydrate intake, and body weight
  • Assists in dietary needs and allergies to help the patient reach their health goals
  • Lets the patient see their vital stats within the dashboard or look more deeply at individual metrics
  • The open source platform allows patients to help diabetes researchers by sharing their data anonymously
  • Track exercise levels
  • Diabetes forums for diabetics community
So what else is missing? The world may solve access to medications and affordability, however, there’s another type of access that’s absent among most of us. Access to providers who work with us in a way that supports and encourages sustainable self-management. And this is probably what’s lacking in the diabetes applications in the market today.
If I were to propose an app idea for diabetes, it would be an application that does not only do the above-mentioned features, but also do a patient-provider interaction by automatically sending the records, specially the critical values, directly to the patient’s endocrinologist or health care provider. In return, the health care provider can address the concerns more quickly. In this way, the health care provider is notified real-time and can respond real-time as well. This would help in keeping a regular interaction of the patient with the healthcare professional, the educator or the professional who can help with the behavioral intervention or the lifestyle counseling which is one of the best predictors of good outcomes.

People can create as many new meds, meters, and apps at people living with diabetes but it doesn’t make all that much difference helping people be more successful managing their diabetes. By innovating the patient-provider interaction, it would help the millions of people with diabetes who continuously strive in doing something for their care.

References:
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28249025
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27861583
http://care.diabetesjournals.org/content/diacare/early/2017/08/01/dc17-0853.full.pdf
https://medcitynews.com/2013/07/whats-still-missing-in-diabetes-innovation-and-its-not-apps-or-devices/?rf=1
https://diabetesstories.com/2017/07/20/whats-missing-in-diabetes-innovation-a-new-provider-patient-relationship/
https://www.healthline.com/health/diabetes/top-iphone-android-apps#BGMonitor9
https://www.medicalnewstoday.com/articles/317364.php

 

How Can Telehealth Support Healthcare Delivery in the Philippines?

In the Philippines, distance is a stumbling block that has made healthcare beyond the reach of most Filipinos and technology helps make health services accessible wherever and whoever they are.

Telehealth provides direct but remote support of clinical healthcare. It offers patients and providers remote access to health informatics data. Telehealth supports public health administration and thus public safety.

Healthcare delivery can be supported in the Philippines through telehealth with the following:

     1. Improve Access to Healthcare

Providing services using telehealth is more feasible for rural healthcare facilities than staffing the facilities with specialist providers. Telehealth allows specialists to visit rural patients virtually, improving access to healthcare as well as offering a wide range of specialty care to rural communities via telemedicine. Also, with an insufficiency of health care professionals, hospitals, health systems, nurses, and doctors can use telehealth solutions to:

  • Connect with patients outside the care delivery system.
  • Reach patients in rural locations.
  • Provide nurse-led telephone triage and education.
  • Deliver physician-led telemedicine care.

  2. Enhance Clinical Workflows

Advanced telehealth technologies can also strengthen clinical workflows. As an example, telehealth platforms can assist staff in recording every patient’s reason for the call or visit quickly, prioritize care delivery, suggest the best treatment guidelines, and identify additional information resources. e-Health technologies can use natural language processing that takes free-text consumer input and translates it into medical terminology. This process codes the patient text for chief complaint, acuity, SNOMED and ICD10 codes, and more. The structured data can then be used by a telehealth platform to automatically place patient cases in rank order, based on the severity of the individual’s chief complaints. This, in turn, provides the fastest, most efficient encounter for each patient.

    3. Reduce Cost

Telehealth drives volume, increases quality of care, and reduces cost by reducing re-admissions and unnecessary emergency department visits for rural communities. In addition, rural patients receiving care via telehealth can avoid driving long distances to access specialty care.

 


 

Telehealth can definitely improve healthcare service delivery and even patient health outcomes. However, regardless of the promising potential of telehealth in addressing healthcare problems, it is also important  to sustain the implementation by capacitating the local health workers who are at the grassroots, simultaneously with strengthening the integration of telemedicine into the traditional health system; emphasize policies on governance and financing; and implement other modalities of telemedicine.

Telehealth

References:
https://telehealth.ph/
https://www.healthitoutcomes.com/doc/ways-telehealth-benefits-patients-and-providers-0001
http://journals.ukzn.ac.za/index.php/JISfTeH/article/view/168

What are the benefits and risks of sharing health data?

Data are essential for surveillance, epidemiological investigation, research, program development, implementation and evaluation. Data can be collected, analyzed and stored identifiable information from a disparate collection of sources and use these in diverse ways. However, health information exchanges raise corresponding legal and policy issues.

In this weeks assignment in Health Informatics, we are asked to answer the driving question: What are the benefits and risks of sharing health data? Answer the driving question in the local context of the Data Privacy Act.

BENEFITS

  • Better Health Solutions

Fundamentally, the more data collected, the more the health solutions can be personalized for patients. With the use of large data in healthcare, better outcomes can be provided. Aggregating large quantities of health data could revolutionize physicians’ ability to diagnose and treat diseases. “If our job is to save lives, then it doesn’t make sense that we not share data and get as many people working on the problems as possible”, says Yale Professor Harlan Krumholz of the need for relevant data to be shared among researchers.

  • Reduces Cost

Some healthcare consumers are often frustrated by having to repeat their medical information to their providers and the lack of access to their own health data that the healthcare providers maintain on their behalf.

  • Cybersecurity Prevention

Healthcare information sharing can aid incident communication and potentially prevent future cybersecurity incidents from happening. Entities should know what happened, how it was discovered, what was the loss, harm, or damage, and also be shown proof that the incident happened.

RISKS

  • Privacy Risks

Concerns over the privacy and security of electronic health information fall into two general categories: (1) concerns about inappropriate releases of information from individual organizations and (2) concerns about the systemic flows of information throughout the health care and related industries. Inappropriate releases from organizations can result either from authorized users who intentionally or unintentionally access or disseminate information in violation of organizational policy or from outsiders who break into an organization’s computer system. The second category—systemic concerns—refers to the open disclosure of patient-identifiable health information to parties that may act against the interests of the specific patient or may otherwise be perceived as invading a patient’s privacy.

  • Security Breaches

Security breaches threaten patient privacy when confidential health information is made available to others without the individual’s consent or authorization. Keeping records secure is a challenge that doctors, public health officials and federal regulators are just beginning to understand.

  • Data Inaccuracy

Inaccurate representation of the patient’s current condition and treatment occurs due to improper use of options such as “cut and paste”. This practice is unacceptable because it increases the risk for patients and liability for clinicians and organizations. Also, loss or destruction of data occurs during data transfer. A growing problem is of medical identity theft. This results in the input of inaccurate information into the record of the victim.

I believe, patients and providers will benefit when the flow of medical information among providers and health systems is open and unencumbered. More efficient and effective medicine is possible if this collaborative spirit and the technology that enables it are embraced by the healthcare industry. However, like what is stated in the Republic Act No. 10173, also known as the Data Privacy Act of 2012,  the collection of personal data “must be a declared, specified, and legitimate purpose” and further provides that consent is required prior to the collection of all personal data. It requires that when obtaining consent, the data subject be informed about the extent and purpose of processing, and it specifically mentions the “automated processing of his or her personal data for profiling, or processing for direct marketing, and data sharing.” Consent is further required for sharing information with affiliates or even mother companies.

References:
http://www.himss.eu/himss-blog/%E2%80%9C-benefits-sharing-data-outweigh-risks-not-doing-so%E2%80%9D
http://time.com/3615161/sharing-health-data/
https://www.healthcatalyst.com/Accountable-Care-Organization-Healthcare-Data-Sharing
https://healthitsecurity.com/features/benefits-challenges-of-secure-healthcare-data-sharing
https://www.nap.edu/read/5595/chapter/5
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4394583/
https://www.athenahealth.com/insight/open-data-sharing-will-improve-care-lower-costs
http://www.officialgazette.gov.ph/2012/08/15/republic-act-no-10173/
https://iapp.org/news/a/summary-philippines-data-protection-act-and-implementing-regulations/
https://www.networkforphl.org/topics__resources/topics__resources/health_information_and_data_sharing/

How does networking contribute to knowledge management?

Knowledge management is essentially about getting the right knowledge to the right person at the right time so they can act more efficiently and effectively to create value for the organization.

Networking is the exchange of information or services among individuals, groups, or institutions.

Based on the definitions, there is a common denominator – exchange of information. In order for the knowledge management be useful for some purposes and which creates value for the organization, there must be an exchange of information. This could be done through approaches and techniques such as peer assists (bringing together a group of peers to elicit feedback on a problem, project, or activity and draw lessons from the participants’ knowledge and experience), coaching, mentorship, storytelling, and online or face-to-face forums such as communities of practice.

An example of knowledge management with networking is the Asia eHealth Information Network (AeHIN). AeHIN promotes better use of information communication technology (ICT) to achieve better health through peer-to-peer assistance and knowledge sharing and learning through a regional approach for greater country-level impacts across South and Southeast Asia.

Last December 2014, the AeHIN held its third general meeting in Manila, Philippines which initiated a more technical series of presentations and panel discussions.

 

Networking contributes to knowledge management by exchanging knowledge and recent experiences, improving data quality, analysis and use; scaling and sustaining investments; implementing data standards; and developing and reusing open source solutions.

References:
http://www.ghspjournal.org/content/3/2/150
http://www.libraryservices.nhs.uk/document_uploads/Marketing
https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/networking/Knowledge_Management.pdf
http://www.knowledge-management-tools.net/knowledge-management-definition.html
http://www.knowledge-management-tools.net/
http://www.aehin.org/AboutUs.aspx

How can Clinical Decision Support Systems (CDSS) Improve the Quality of Healthcare?

Driving Question: How can Clinical Decision Support Systems (CDSS) improve the quality of healthcare? CHITS is an electronic medical record currently being used by many regional health units nationwide. Think of a clinical scenario and suggest a clinical decision support system embedded within CHITS to address this.

A large part of physician’s work involves acquiring information and then making decisions for the best possible outcome. In earlier days, this whole process could take place in the brain of the practitioner. However, with the growing amount of data now available for each patient and the increasing body of medical evidence, we need tools to help us make rational decisions based on all this information. Computer technology can assist by generating case-specific advice for clinical decision making. The systems used are usually referred to as clinical decision support systems or CDSS.

The Community Health Information Tracking System (CHITS) is an electronic medical record system developed by the National Telehealth Center (NTHC) to improve health information management at the RHU level. It was also built to gather data and generate reports which health workers need and decision makers require. The embedded CDSS within CHITS contributes to increased quality of care and enhanced health outcomes, error and adverse event avoidance, improved efficiency, reduced costs, and enhanced provider and patient satisfaction.

To illustrate this point, imagine this scenario:

clinical_decision

  • While his doctor is out-of-town, an elderly patient who has developed severe knee pain sees another physician in the RHU with CHITS. The doctor was provided a documentation of the last visit, including recent laboratory results and a list of the patient’s medications. This information easily brought the doctor up to date on the patient’s condition. Prior to the last visit, a record in CHITS also showed that the patient had just recently visited due to asthma and the doctor was also able to view his medications for the asthma. Because of this, the doctor was guided not to enter painkillers like non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) that can be risky in triggering asthma attacks.

CDSS can really bring a potentially powerful method for improving health care quality. Without CDSS, problems like drug interaction could occur. This scenario illustrates that EMRs are the foundation for patient safety and health care quality improvement, but CDSS is an essential element in fully realizing these goals.

References:
http://www.bcmj.org/article/clinical-decision-support-systems
https://telehealth.ph/project-chits/
https://healthit.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/docs/page/09-0069-EF_1.pdf
https://www.webmd.com/asthma/features/everyday-pain-relief-asthma#1

Scoring System on the Usefulness of Personal Health Records

A lot of Personal Health Records (PHR) software and service providers are available in the market nowadays and choosing one that fits your needs is not easy. PHR will store all your personal medical records in one place and moving data from one system to another will be difficult, so you must take caution and choose the right software that suit your needs.

What are examples of useful features of a Personal Health Record?

The features of the PHR software vary widely. Below are few examples that can be the most useful features for the users including a score system that I created (Score Ranging From 1-10, 10 being the highest importance / usefulness).

Features

Score

Organizing health records, including medication reconciliation

9

Availability of online calendars and reminders

7

Personalized health education

7

Consumers and permitted providers can access PHRs at any place at any time

7

Online health communication with providers and health plans

6

Health care cost management

6

  1. Organizing health records, including medication reconciliation

These are the standard defining features of any PHR system. In organizing health records, you should be able to add, delete, correct and track the past medical history including accessing doctor, laboratory, and hospital records; organizing current health history, immunizations, registration, and health plan information; and organizing medications.

    2. Availability of online calendars and reminders

Support for scheduling of medical events can also be a useful feature, linking the calendar entry to detailed information about the specific occurrence. An automatic  connection between calendar entries and their corresponding visits, tests, and treatments would be helpful. This support means that you will not need to enter scheduling information twice: it is sufficient to create a visit and to indicate the visit time and date; the calendar entry is automatically created and linked to the visit.

    3. Personalized Health Education

Many people are now interested in receiving information on how to self-manage using personalized action plans for a specific illness, such as heart disease. Advanced features like this will help users take control of their health. They can set health goals and measure the success, or set up monitoring and get alerts on their health conditions. This is an area where PHR providers can get really creative and offer suite of services.

    4. Consumers and permitted providers can access PHRs at any place at any time

The accessibility of health information in a PHR may facilitate appropriate and improved treatment for conditions or emergencies that occur away from an individual’s usual health care provider. Additionally, the ability to access one’s own health information in a PHR may assist individuals in identifying potential errors or mistakes in their information.

    5. Online health communication with providers and health plans

Ability to share info with healthcare providers is also important. Through this feature, the user will be able to make appointments online, share medical information both ways, consult doctors from PHR, and obtain prescriptions without visiting doctor’s office.

    6. Health care cost management

Some PHR systems are offered free and rest charge a small fee. If it appears free, make sure the business model is well understood and how the information will be used is checked. It is important to go with trusted providers, so that the data is backed up often, not compromised, and will be available all the time.

References:
http://www.phrreviews.com/how-to-choose-a-phr
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK43760/
http://library.ahima.org/doc?oid=67357#.WdTw8NFx3IU
https://www.hhs.gov/sites/default/files/ocr/privacy/hipaa/understanding/special/healthit/phrs.pdf
http://www.myhealthfolio.com/

Significance of Standards in Health Informatics

This week’s requirement for my HI 201 class is to create a concept map and answer the driving question, “Why are standards important in health informatics?”

The  healthcare field landscape consists of a variety of care settings and stakeholders, which all leverage a number of different information systems in their delivery of care. Standards provide a common language and set of expectations that enable interoperability between these systems and/or devices. Ideally, data exchange schema and standards should permit data to be shared between clinician, lab, hospital, pharmacy, and patient regardless of application or vendor in order to seamlessly digest information about an individual and improve the overall coordination and delivery of healthcare.

The concept map I made shows my understanding on why the standards and interoperability significant in health informatics. The concept map is adapted from the Common eHealth Standards and Interoperability Components of the WHO.

Standards and Interoperability

The standards and interoperability components enable the consistent and accurate collection and exchange of health information across geographical and health-sector boundaries. Without these components, health information cannot be collected consistently, will be open to misinterpretation, and will be difficult or impossible to share due to incompatibilities in data structures and terminologies.

The Data Structure Standards govern the way health datasets are stored using consistent data structures and can be presented with consistency in software applications, to ensure information is neither misinterpreted nor overlooked. Examples are referrals and specialist letters, health event summaries, prescriptions, test orders and results, care plans, real-time clinical data, appointments, and electronic health records

Common Terminologies enable information communicated electronically to make use of a common language for describing symptoms, diagnoses and treatments such as clinical coding standards, medical terminology standards and medicines terminology standards.

Messaging Standards like the message structures, message transmission protocols and message acknowledgement protocols allow data to be transmitted and received through the secure messaging infrastructure from one care provider to another. They also define the acknowledgements that should be provided when a message is delivered or opened and the warnings to be generated if the message is not delivered, or is declined.

Secure Messaging Standards are for the secure transmission and delivery of messages and the appropriate authentication of the message receiver, to ensure that information is securely transmitted and delivered to the correct recipient. This is where privacy and confidentiality, authentication and non-repudiation fall.

Lastly, the Software Accreditation Standards. These define the criteria with which eHealth software products and services must comply in order to be certified as able to exchange health information with the national eHealth environment.

In summary, quality healthcare requires effective collaboration and the ability to communicate essential information between and among all the stakeholders in order to facilitate continuity of care.

 

References:
http://www.himss.org/library/interoperability-standards/why-do-we-need-standards
https://www.itu.int/dms_pub/itu-d/opb/str/D-STR-E_HEALTH.05-2012-PDF-E.pdf
https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&cad=rja&uact=8&ved=0ahUKEwjcwfmwsbbWAhWMmpQKHau_BxwQFggnMAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fsacj.cs.uct.ac.za%2Findex.php%2Fsacj%2Farticle%2Fdownload%2F363%2F164&usg=AFQjCNGqbMZJLf0Fz2xBbGo0BMiKjNlY2A
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3221346/

Importance of Health Information Exchange in the Philippines

For this week’s requirement, we were asked to answer the question “Why does the Philippines need a health information exchange?” and we must also show our answer through a concept map.

Health information exchange (HIE) is the mobilization of health care information electronically across organizations within a region, community or hospital system. HIE allows doctors, nurses, pharmacists, other health care providers and patients to appropriately access and securely share a patient’s vital medical information electronically—improving the speed, quality, safety and cost of patient care. Through HIE, everyone can gain access and receive the necessary health services in order to ensure equal benefits even to the most remote areas of the Philippines.

In the Philippines, the partnership among the Department of Science and Technology (DOST), the Philippine Health Insurance Corporation (PHIC) and the Department of Health (DOH) came out with the Philippine Health Information Exchange (PHIE), which is a platform for secure electronic access and efficient exchange of health data and/or information among health facilities, health care providers, health information organizations, and government agencies in accordance with set national standards in the interest of public health.

Health Information Exchange

With HIE, the primary care provider and specialists can easily use and securely send patient information—such as laboratory orders and results, patient referrals, or discharge summaries—directly to another health care professional. A primary care provider can directly send electronic care summaries that include medications, problems, and lab results to a specialist when referring their patients even to other hospitals. This information helps to inform the visit and prevents the duplication of tests, redundant collection of information from the patient, wasted visits, and medication errors. Physicians can also utilize information exchange to access patient information—such as medications, recent radiology images, and problem lists—and they may adjust treatment plans to avoid adverse medication reactions or duplicate testing.

In summary, HIE is important in the Philippines because it can help bring a patient’s health information together from multiple sources so everyone can be on the same page.  The implementation of PHIE shall promote public health, improve total patient care and better decision making, while safeguarding the right to privacy of every individual.

 

References:
https://www.healthit.gov/providers-professionals/health-information-exchange/what-hie
http://www.ehealth.ph/index.php/blogs/tag/Philippine%20Health%20Information%20Exchange
https://privacywiki.serbizhub.net/lib/exe/fetch.php/joint_ao_2016-0001_implentation_of_the_phie.pdf
https://www.philhealth.gov.ph/joint_issuances/2016/jao2016-0003.pdf
http://www.himssasiapac.org/sites/default/files/HIMSSAP_AP15Slides_AnUpdateonthePhilippineHealthInformationExchange.pdf